Skip to the content

Topics Covered

Three Principles CRD Concept Layout Advantages Statistical Analysis Critical Difference
On this page
  1. 1. Terminology of Designs
  2. 2. Three Principles of Design of Experiments (Fisher)
  3. 3. Completely Randomised Design (CRD)
  4. 4. Layout of CRD
  5. 5. Statistical Analysis of CRD
  6. 6. Critical Difference (CD) — Pairwise Treatment Comparison
  7. 7. Efficiency of CRD
  8. Key Take-aways

1. Terminology of Designs

2. Three Principles of Design of Experiments (Fisher)

PRINCIPLES
  1. Replication — applying each treatment to several units to estimate experimental error and increase precision.
  2. Randomization — assigning treatments at random to experimental units, ensuring unbiasedness and validity of statistical tests.
  3. Local control — grouping homogeneous units into blocks to reduce experimental error (used in RBD, LSD; not in CRD).

3. Completely Randomised Design (CRD)

DEFINITION

The simplest design — each treatment is allotted to experimental units completely at random. Only two principles are used: replication and randomization. There is no local control / blocking.

When to use CRD?

Advantages

  1. Most flexible — number of replications per treatment can vary.
  2. Maximum number of degrees of freedom for error (highest precision when units are homogeneous).
  3. Simple statistical analysis (one-way ANOVA).
  4. Loss of one or more observations causes minimal complications.

Disadvantages

  1. Inefficient when units are heterogeneous (variation gets pooled into error).
  2. Not suitable for field experiments where soil fertility varies across plots.

Applications

4. Layout of CRD

Suppose 3 treatments T1, T2, T3 with 4 replicates each → 12 plots numbered 1–12. Assign treatments completely at random.

CRD Layout — 3 treatments × 4 replicates (random assignment) T2 T1 T3 T2 T3 T2 T1 T3 T1 T2 T1 T3
Fig 2.1 — A CRD layout: every plot's treatment is assigned completely at random

5. Statistical Analysis of CRD

The model and SS formulas are exactly those of the one-way ANOVA (Unit 1).

Mathematical Model

\[ y_{ij} = \mu + \alpha_i + \epsilon_{ij}, \]

where \(\alpha_i\) is the effect of the \(i\)-th treatment and \(\epsilon_{ij} \sim N(0, \sigma^2)\).

Hypotheses

\(H_0: \alpha_1 = \alpha_2 = \cdots = \alpha_k = 0\) vs \(H_1\): not all \(\alpha_i\) equal.

ANOVA Table

SourcedfSSMSF
Treatments\(k-1\)\(\text{SS}_{Tr}\)\(\text{MS}_{Tr}\)\(\text{MS}_{Tr}/\text{MS}_E\)
Error\(N-k\)\(\text{SS}_E\)\(\text{MS}_E\)—
Total\(N-1\)\(\text{SS}_T\)

Reject \(H_0\) if \(F > F_{\alpha,\, k-1,\, N-k}\).

6. Critical Difference (CD) — Pairwise Treatment Comparison

If the F-test rejects \(H_0\), we want to know which pairs of treatments differ. Use the critical difference (Least Significant Difference, LSD):

\[ \text{CD} \;=\; t_{\alpha/2,\, \text{df}_E}\, \times \,\sqrt{\text{MS}_E\!\left(\dfrac{1}{n_i} + \dfrac{1}{n_j}\right)}. \]

For equal replications \(n\):

\[ \text{CD} \;=\; t_{\alpha/2,\, \text{df}_E}\, \times \,\sqrt{\dfrac{2\, \text{MS}_E}{n}}. \]

Two treatments \(T_i\) and \(T_j\) differ significantly if \(|\bar y_i - \bar y_j| > \text{CD}\).

Worked Example

EXAMPLE 1 (Full CRD analysis)

Yield per plot for 3 fertilizers (k=3), 4 replicates each, total 12 plots:

F122262428Total = 100
F230343236Total = 132
F320222422Total = 88

From Unit 1 Example 1: \(\text{SS}_T = 306.67, \text{SS}_{Tr} = 258.67, \text{SS}_E = 48,\; \text{MS}_E = 48/9 = 5.33\). \(F = 24.25\) (significant).

CD at 5 %: \(t_{0.025, 9} = 2.262;\; \text{CD} = 2.262 \sqrt{2(5.33)/4} = 2.262 \times 1.633 = 3.69\).

Means: \(\bar y_1 = 25,\; \bar y_2 = 33,\; \bar y_3 = 22\).

Differences: |25−33|=8 (> 3.69 ⇒ differ); |25−22|=3 (≤ 3.69 ⇒ no); |33−22|=11 (⇒ differ).

Conclusion: F2 differs from both F1 and F3; F1 and F3 are statistically equal.

EXAMPLE 2 (CD for unequal n)

From Unit 1 Example 2 (unequal n): \(\text{MS}_E = 5,\; t_{0.025, 6} = 2.447\).

CD between V1 (n₁=3) and V2 (n₂=4): \(2.447 \sqrt{5(1/3 + 1/4)} = 2.447 \sqrt{2.917} = 4.18\). \(|22 - 31| = 9 > 4.18\) ⇒ differ.

7. Efficiency of CRD

Key Take-aways

Extra Practical Problems

PRACTICE

Additional worked problems with step-by-step procedures to support self-study, matching this unit's topics.

STEP-BY-STEP PROCEDURE (CRD analysis)
  1. CRD uses only replication and randomization (no local control); the experimental area must be homogeneous. With \(t\) treatments replicated \(r_1, r_2, \ldots, r_t\) times, total units \(N = \sum r_i\).
  2. Grand total \(G\); correction factor \(C = G^2/N\).
  3. \(\text{TSS} = \sum\sum x_{ij}^2 - C\).
  4. \(\text{Treatment SS} = \sum \dfrac{T_i^2}{r_i} - C\) (divide each treatment total by its own replication count — this is the key step for unequal replication).
  5. \(\text{Error SS} = \text{TSS} - \text{Treatment SS}\).
  6. df: Treatment \(= t-1\), Error \(= N-t\), Total \(= N-1\). Build the ANOVA table and compute \(F = \text{MST}/\text{MSE}\).
  7. Compare with \(F_\alpha(t-1, N-t)\). For comparing two treatment means, \(\text{CD} = t_{\alpha,\text{error df}}\times\sqrt{\text{MSE}\left(\frac{1}{r_i}+\frac{1}{r_j}\right)}\).

Problem 1 — CRD with Unequal Replication

DATA

Mycelial growth (mm) of 5 R. solani isolates on PDA medium (unequal replications):

IsolateRepl 1Repl 2Repl 3Total \(T_i\)Mean
RS 129.028.029.086.028.67
RS 233.531.529.094.031.33
RS 326.530.0—56.528.25
RS 448.546.549.0144.048.00
RS 534.531.0—65.532.75

Grand total \(G = 446\), \(N = 13\). Correction factor \(C = 446^2/13 = 15301.23\).

\(\text{TSS} = \sum y^2 - C = 789.27\); \(\text{Treatment SS} = \sum \frac{T_i^2}{n_i} - C = 762.69\); \(\text{Error SS} = 789.27 - 762.69 = 26.58\).

SourcedfSSMS\(F\)\(F_{0.05}\)
Treatment4762.69190.6757.38*3.84
Error826.583.32
Total12789.27

Since \(F = 57.38 > 3.84\), the isolates differ significantly. For comparing RS 1 and RS 2: SE \(=\sqrt{3.32\left(\frac13+\frac13\right)} = 1.49\); with \(t_{0.05,8} = 2.30\), \(CD = 1.49\times 2.30 = 3.44\). The observed difference 2.66 < 3.44, so RS 1 and RS 2 do not differ significantly, whereas RS 4 differs significantly from every other isolate.

KEY POINT

In CRD with unequal replication the treatment sum of squares uses \(\sum \dfrac{T_i^2}{n_i}\) (each total divided by its own replication count), and the standard error of a difference uses the two relevant \(n_i\): \(\text{SE} = \sqrt{\text{MSE}\left(\frac{1}{n_i}+\frac{1}{n_j}\right)}\).