Skip to the content

Topics Covered

Concept and Objectives of Teaching Levels of Teaching Characteristics of Teaching Adolescent and Adult Learners Individual Differences Factors Affecting Teaching Teacher- and Learner-centred Methods SWAYAM, SWAYAM Prabha and MOOCs Teaching Support Systems Elements and Types of Evaluation Evaluation in CBCS Computer-based Testing

Topic Overview — What & Why

Unit I asks whether you understand teaching as a planned, two-way process rather than as talking to a room. Its questions are of three kinds: who said what (the levels of teaching and their proponents, Bloom's domains, andragogy), which is the better practice (a learner-centred method for a given aim, the right kind of evaluation for a given purpose), and how the Indian system works (SWAYAM, CBCS grading, computer-based tests).

  • Teaching is an interaction between a teacher, learners and content, aimed at learning; its objectives are usually stated through Bloom's three domains.
  • Levels: memory (Herbart), understanding (Morrison), reflective (Hunt) — from teacher-dominated to learner-centred.
  • Learners differ by age (adolescents and adults learn differently: pedagogy and andragogy) and individually (intelligence, style, pace, background).
  • Methods run from teacher-centred (lecture, demonstration) to learner-centred (discussion, project, problem-solving, case study), and from classroom to online (SWAYAM, MOOCs).
  • Evaluation checks whether objectives were met: formative or summative, norm- or criterion-referenced; in Indian universities it runs on CBCS credits and grade points.

1. Teaching: Concept and Objectives

Teaching is a planned interaction in which a teacher arranges content, activities and conditions so that learners learn. Its test is the learning that results, not the talk that was given.

Three ideas about teaching recur in the paper:

Objectives: Bloom's three domains

The objectives of teaching are usually written as changes in what learners know, feel and can do. Benjamin Bloom and colleagues (1956) set out the cognitive domain; later work added the other two.

DomainConcernsLevels, lowest to highest
Cognitive (Bloom, 1956)Knowing and thinkingKnowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, evaluation
Cognitive, revised (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001)The same, as verbsRemember, understand, apply, analyse, evaluate, create
Affective (Krathwohl, Bloom & Masia, 1964)Feelings, values, attitudesReceiving, responding, valuing, organisation, characterisation by a value
Psychomotor (Simpson, 1972; Dave, 1970)Physical skillsSimpson: perception, set, guided response, mechanism, complex overt response, adaptation, origination. Dave: imitation, manipulation, precision, articulation, naturalisation

Note the change at the top of the cognitive domain: in the revision, create (once "synthesis") is the highest level, above evaluate.

EXAMPLE 1 "Students will be able to list the steps of research" is a remember objective; "students will design a study to test a claim" is a create objective. The verb tells you the level.
EXAMPLE 2 A teacher who wants learners to value honesty in reporting data is writing an affective objective. It is tested by what they do (do they report a result that went against them?), not by a recall question.

Maxims of teaching

The classic maxims say in which order to present content: known to unknown, simple to complex, concrete to abstract, particular to general, whole to part, analysis to synthesis, empirical to rational and psychological to logical (start from the learner's interest, end with the subject's logical order).

2. Levels of Teaching: Memory, Understanding, Reflective

The three levels describe how deeply a lesson engages the learner's mind. Each assumes the one below it.

LevelProponentAimRoles
Memory levelJ. F. HerbartRecall of facts; rote learningTeacher dominant, learner passive; the lowest, "thoughtless" level
Understanding levelH. C. MorrisonGrasp of meaning, relations and principles; "memory plus insight"Teacher still leads; learner more active
Reflective levelH. Hunt (Morris L. Bigge and Maurice P. Hunt)Problem-solving, critical and original thinkingLearner-centred; teacher creates the problem situation; the highest level
EXAMPLE 1 Learners repeat the dates of the five-year plans until they can say them back: memory level. They explain why the plans moved from agriculture to industry: understanding level. They argue what India's next plan should prioritise, using evidence: reflective level.
EXAMPLE 2 A question asks which level is most learner-centred and develops critical thinking. The answer is the reflective level; the memory level is the most teacher-centred.

3. Characteristics and Basic Requirements of Teaching

Characteristics of good teaching, as the paper asks about them:

Basic requirements are what must be in place for teaching to happen at all: a teacher with command of the subject and the skill to communicate it; learners who are ready (prior knowledge, motivation); content suited to them; a method suited to the objective; time, space and materials; and a way to evaluate what was learnt.

EXAMPLE 1 A brilliant lecture that no student can follow has a teacher and content, but fails the requirement of learner readiness: the teacher did not start from what the learners knew.
EXAMPLE 2 A teacher notices, from the answers to a short quiz, that half the class confuses mean and median, and teaches it again with a new example. This is the diagnostic and remedial character of teaching.

4. Adolescent and Adult Learners

The syllabus asks about four kinds of characteristic: academic, social, emotional and cognitive.

Adolescent learners (about 12–19)Adult learners
AcademicNeed structure and guidance; motivation often external (marks, approval)Self-directed; want learning they can use now; bring a lot of experience
SocialPeer group matters greatly; seek independence from adultsRoles as workers, parents, citizens; learn well from one another
EmotionalRapid change; identity forming; sensitive to criticismMore stable; may fear failure in front of others; resist being treated as children
CognitiveMove into abstract thought: Piaget's formal operational stage (from about 11)Reason from experience; problem-centred; may be slower at rote tasks, better at judgement

Two names to know:

EXAMPLE 1 A course for working nurses on data handling starts with a real ward problem the nurses bring, not with definitions. That follows andragogy: problem-centred, using the learners' experience.
EXAMPLE 2 A first-year undergraduate class works better in small peer groups with clear tasks and early feedback, because adolescents are peer-oriented and sensitive to public correction.

5. Individual Differences

Individual differences are the ways in which learners of the same age and class differ: in intelligence, aptitude, prior knowledge, pace, interests, learning style, motivation, personality and background.
EXAMPLE 1 In one class, some students solve a problem at once and others need a worked example. Giving the first group an extension task and the second a guided one is differentiated instruction.
EXAMPLE 2 A question asks which practice best addresses individual differences: "the same lecture for all, at the same pace" is wrong; "varied methods, with self-paced material and remedial help" is right.

6. Factors Affecting Teaching

The syllabus names six, and questions often ask you to place a factor in its group.

FactorIncludes
TeacherSubject knowledge, communication skill, personality, attitude, enthusiasm, preparation, experience, health
LearnerReadiness, prior knowledge, motivation, ability, interest, attention, health, family background
Support materialTextbooks, notes, models, charts, audio-visual aids, e-content
Instructional facilitiesClassrooms, labs, library, projectors, internet, seating, lighting
Learning environmentClassroom climate, discipline, teacher–student relations, peer relations, freedom to ask
InstitutionPolicies, time-table, class size, leadership, resources, academic culture
EXAMPLE 1 A class of 150 in a hall without a microphone: class size is an institutional factor, the missing microphone an instructional facility.
EXAMPLE 2 Students who are afraid to ask questions because they were mocked before: a learning environment factor, which the teacher can change.

7. Teacher-centred and Learner-centred Methods

Teacher-centredLearner-centred
Who is activeThe teacher presents; learners receiveLearners inquire, discuss, do; the teacher guides
ExamplesLecture, demonstration, recitationDiscussion, seminar, project, problem-solving, case study, brainstorming, role play, flipped classroom, cooperative learning
Good forLarge classes, new information, limited timeUnderstanding and reflective aims, skills, attitudes

Methods and their originators, often asked:

EXAMPLE 1 To teach the steps of a sample survey to 30 students, a teacher has them plan and run a small survey of the campus canteen. That is the project method: learner-centred and real.
EXAMPLE 2 A question asks for the method that best develops problem-solving in a large class with little time. A short lecture followed by a problem worked in pairs (a mix) usually beats either alone; if one option must be chosen, prefer the learner-centred one that fits the aim.

8. Off-line and On-line Methods: SWAYAM, SWAYAM Prabha, MOOCs

Off-line methods are face-to-face, in a room at a set time. On-line methods use the internet, and may be synchronous (live: a webinar, a live class) or asynchronous (any time: recorded lectures, forums). Blended learning mixes the two.

MOOC — a Massive Open Online Course: open to anyone, usually free to join, for very large numbers, delivered online. The term was coined in 2008 for an open online course run by George Siemens and Stephen Downes.

SWAYAM

SWAYAM Prabha

EXAMPLE 1 A student in a village with weak internet follows a statistics course on a SWAYAM Prabha channel, then takes the course's quiz on SWAYAM when connected. That is off-line and on-line used together.
EXAMPLE 2 A question lists the four quadrants of a SWAYAM course and asks which is not one. "Classroom attendance" is not; e-tutorial, e-content, self-assessment and discussion forum are.

9. Teaching Support Systems: Traditional, Modern, ICT-based

SystemExamples
TraditionalChalkboard, textbook, charts, maps, models, specimens, flannel board
ModernOverhead and slide projectors, audio and video recordings, radio and television lessons, language labs
ICT-basedInteractive (smart) boards, presentation software, learning management systems (Moodle and the like), MOOCs, simulations, virtual labs, e-books, video conferencing

Edgar Dale's Cone of Experience (1946) arranges teaching aids from the most concrete at the base (direct, purposeful experiences) through contrived experiences, demonstrations, field trips, exhibits, television and film, recordings and pictures, visual symbols, to the most abstract at the top (verbal symbols). The higher an aid sits, the more it depends on words alone.

Aids are also grouped by sense: audio (radio, recordings), visual (chart, slide, model) and audio-visual (film, television, video).

EXAMPLE 1 A field visit to a dairy to see quality control is near the base of Dale's cone; reading a definition of quality control is at the top.
EXAMPLE 2 A virtual lab that lets students change a sample size and watch the sampling distribution change is an ICT-based support, and closer to the concrete end than a lecture on the same idea.

10. Evaluation: Elements and Types

Evaluation is the systematic process of judging how far the objectives of teaching have been achieved. It is wider than measurement (assigning numbers) and assessment (collecting evidence): it adds a value judgement.

Elements. Evaluation is tied to two other things in a triangle: the objectives, the learning experiences that serve them, and the evaluation that checks them. Change one and the others must follow.

Types by purpose and timing:

TypeWhenPurpose
PlacementBefore teachingDecide where a learner should start
FormativeDuring teachingFeedback to improve learning while it is going on
DiagnosticWhen difficulties persistFind the causes of a learning difficulty
SummativeAt the endJudge and certify what was achieved; grades
EXAMPLE 1 A weekly ungraded quiz whose results change the next week's lessons is formative. The end-of-semester examination is summative.
EXAMPLE 2 "Top 6% of candidates qualify" is norm-referenced; "everyone scoring 40% or more qualifies" is criterion-referenced.

11. Evaluation in the Choice Based Credit System

The Choice Based Credit System (CBCS) was introduced by the UGC in Indian universities from 2015–16. Students choose from core, elective and skill courses, earn credits for each, and are graded on a ten-point scale.

Letter gradeOA+AB+BCPFAb
MeaningOutstandingExcellentVery goodGoodAbove averageAveragePassFailAbsent
Grade point1098765400

SGPA (semester grade point average) is the credit-weighted mean of the grade points: the sum of (credits × grade point) over the semester's courses, divided by the sum of the credits. CGPA is the same over all semesters so far.

EXAMPLE 1 Three courses of 4, 4 and 2 credits with grade points 9, 7 and 10. SGPA = (4×9 + 4×7 + 2×10) / (4 + 4 + 2) = (36 + 28 + 20) / 10 = 8.4.
EXAMPLE 2 Semester 1: 20 credits, SGPA 8.0. Semester 2: 22 credits, SGPA 7.0. CGPA = (20×8.0 + 22×7.0) / 42 = (160 + 154) / 42 = 314 / 42 ≈ 7.48. It is not the simple average 7.5, because the semesters carry different credits.

12. Computer-based Testing and Innovations in Evaluation

In computer-based testing (CBT) the candidate reads and answers on a computer at a test centre, and the machine records and scores the answers. UGC NET itself is held this way by the National Testing Agency.

Innovations in evaluation that questions name: grading in place of marks; continuous internal assessment; open-book examinations; online and on-demand examinations; question banks; rubrics; e-portfolios; peer and self-assessment; and credit banks such as the Academic Bank of Credits, which stores the credits a student earns so they can be carried between institutions.

EXAMPLE 1 A rubric for a project report gives separate scores for the question, the method, the analysis and the writing, each with a described standard. It makes marking more objective and tells the student where they lost marks.
EXAMPLE 2 In an adaptive test two candidates may see different questions and still be scored on the same scale, because each question's difficulty is known in advance.
Exam pointers for Unit I.
  • Memory — Herbart; understanding — Morrison; reflective — Hunt. Reflective is the highest and most learner-centred.
  • Revised Bloom: remember → understand → apply → analyse → evaluate → create.
  • Andragogy — Knowles; adult learning is self-directed and problem-centred.
  • Formative/summative — Scriven; norm/criterion-referenced — Glaser.
  • SWAYAM's four quadrants: e-tutorial, e-content, self-assessment, discussion forum.
  • CBCS: ten-point scale, O = 10 to P = 4; SGPA is credit-weighted.

Final Revision Checklist

Sources